(:: History ::)
Will Atenton, a successful editor becomes established with his wife and his children in a city of New England where he buys the house of his dreams. The dream however becomes a nightmare when the family learns that the previous occupiers were assassinated there. Will investigates then with his neighbour to discover what indeed took place.Some say that all houses have memories. For one man, his home is the place he would kill to forget. A family unknowingly moves into a home where several grisly murders were committed...only to find themselves the killers next target. Successful publisher Will Atenton (Craig) quit a job in New York City to relocate his wife, Libby (Weisz), and two girls to a quaint New England town. But as they settle into their new life, they discover their perfect home was the murder scene of a mother and her children. And the entire city believes it was at the hands of the husband who survived. When Will investigates the tragedy, his only lead comes from Ann Paterson (Watts), a neighbor who was close to the family that died. As Will and Ann piece together the disturbing puzzle, they discover that the story of the last man to leave Wills dream house will be just as horrifying to the one who came next.
Date (s) of Exit (s):
October 05th, 2011 | 
September 30th, 2011| Accomplished by: | Jim Sheridan |
| With: | Daniel Craig, Rachel Weisz, Naomi Watts, Marton Csokas, Claire Geare, Taylor Geare, Rachel G. Fox terrier, Mark Wilson, Jonathan Potts, Lynne Griffin, Elias Koteas... |
| Distributor: | Warner Bros. France |
| Type: | Thriller |
| Country: | USA |
| Length: | 1 h 34 |
| Original title: | Dream House |
| Programmed in: | 7 cinema in France |
Official Site (s):
France: http://www.warnerbros.fr/dreamhouse/
USA: http://www.dreamhousemovie.net/
(:: Trailer for Dream House ::)
(:: Free Streaming to Watch Dream House Online ::)
======>>>>>
<<<<<======
(:: Pictures Of Dream House ::)
(:: Downloads Links ::)
DVD RIP, XVID, DIVX, TS, AVI:
french : http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3SA8U698english : http://www.wupload.com/file/2262629127/Dream.House.2011.CAM.XviD-ILLUMINATI.avi
OR http://www.filesonic.com/file/3250233025/Dream.House.2011.PLSUBBED.TS.XviD-FURiA.avi
3gp, MP4, cam:
part 1 : http://ifile.it/a3iowmd
part 2 : http://ifile.it/mdiv97q
(:: Our critic ::)
Last time when they discussed Jim Sheridan, it was to recall Brothers (remake of Brødre of Susanne Bier), its previous film, or column, cruelly, of a Marine completely crushed by its Iraqi experience. Across the destiny of Tommy, the irlando-American film director recalled what they call that PTSD (neurological disturbances, cardiological problems and diseases psychiatric such as depression, risk of suicide and syndrome of stress) who mortifies the contingents of the American Army. They will still remind that Sheridan is the film director of left My football, The Field and especially In the name of The father: consequent films, marks of a big plant. Sheridan is a film-maker to follow.
Learn that he is going to run Daniel Craig, Rachel Weisz and Naomi Watts in a labelled film horrific thriller, predicted that of the token. Then why does the press persevere in taking Dream House down? Undoubtedly because the first one left the film irrefutably makes think of the already seeing, almost to copy – stick, type Others, Shutter Island and various references of type. On the screen, he makes any doubt fast only under features of this perfect family of the American middle-class represented by Craig and Weisz hides well from terrible secrets - blow has been already made us.
Dream House finds however a rebound of interest in its half, when the spectator understands that by way of thriller, history narrates impact strength (capacity of an individual affected by a traumatism to take note of event not to live any more in depression – "Thank you Wiki") of a psychopath who isn't one. Will Atenton forgot that he was Peter; its psyche refuses the murder of all its coldly assassinated family there is it 5 years. So, by reliving in a cerebral way days happy with Peter, Will searches why of his depression, why of the dreadful death of his dear missing persons, why of the interest of his neighbour of opposite (Naomi Watts), etc. Is Will Peter or Peter is he Will?
This can seem a bit confused on the paper but is perfectly oiled on the screen. Unfortunately, the treatment is rickety, of a staggering obviousness, with a too quickly sent outcome, or even bluntly disappointing given desired problems. Both final stages are pathetic (to die to laugh). To crown the whole, casting doesn't make masses, as the realisation which skates. Where from the acrid critics of the press. Sheridan's worst film...
Reynald Dal Barco
(:: Wings of the film ::)
Genesis of the film:In 2009, the producers and linked Daniel Bobker and Ehren Kruger subjected the scenario of Dream House to the CEO of Morgan Creek, James G. Robinson, and to his vice-president David Robinson. Bobker and Kruge, who had collaborated on the fantastic thriller The Skeleton Key and in the film of adventures The brothers Grimm, was interested by topics approached in this psychological thriller by the scriptwriter David Loucka, and persuaded that Morgan Creek was the partner whom they searched to develop and to fi nancer plan. Loucka imagined the captivating history of Will Atenton, reputed editor, who leaves a job enthralling in New York to dedicate himself more to his wife and to their two daughters in their home of News-England. While he starts his writer's new career, the life of the small family is unsettled by strange events occurring in the home. He must face the facts from now on: the visible peace of the small city is very misleading...
James G. Robinson explains what enticed him in scenario: «In most thrillers, rebounds are very quickly envisaged, and the film director tries, so-so, to hide traces left by the murderer. What differentiates Dream House of other films of type, it is that he reveals intrigue and suspense as intrigue advances and as he adopts the point of view of a character. While Will tries to unmask the murderer – and to include what really took place – he doubts himself and fi nit to wonder if he isn't a bit guilty. Idea was really liked that the public could cast his own anxiety on the characters. Little by little, the spectator comes to doubt his own perception of intrigue».
To stage this intrigue in numerous rebounds, the producers called the film director named to the Oscar Jim Sheridan. Irish film-maker known to have run Daniel Day-Lewis (of My Left Foot in in The name Of The Father and The Boxer) or for personal writings as In America or Brothers, Jim Sheridan didn't think that his new film would be a psychological thriller. But it was interested by the nervousness of the writing and by the capacity of the scriptwriter to pass from a type to the other one and to hold the reader in breath.
One might as well say that he was delighted at the idea of accomplishing this film. «I read scenario and I was enticed due to the fact that the protagonist lives in two realities at the same time», he underlines. «They never know very well where they are. They don't know well what is true and what isn't it, or that is the murderer. Besides, they don't know even if it is about a murder».
If the film-maker so much appreciated the history of Loucka, it is because he makes sure that the reader is in absolute empathy with Will and that he reveals our instinctive fright at losing an expensive being. «I think that, very often, people protect themselves from tragic events by taking refuge in dream worlds», he follows.
«For me, the invention, fundamentally, is an intellectual device invented by the men to block the unbearable reality of death».
The film director recalls his conception of of production: «I try to surround emotions of the characters», he says. «I try to grab the invisible: the world which they don't see willy-nilly in the bare eye, but which is felt. It isn't so much the aesthetics which interested me that the emotional confusion which occurs at Will's because it is changes which come from the deepest of him and that splash back on events».
During preparations, Sheridan began uniting his team and choosing his actors. For title role, he wished such a comfortable actor in the scenes of action as in the dramatic register.
Casting:
For the character of Will Atenton – that the film-maker describes as «a man who discovers things on him of whom he was unaware» – production chose Daniel Craig. «Daniel is the type of guy which reassures the women», underlines the movie director. «He has the air of a type well, and it is besides what it is: a type well. It is a true pleasure of working with him».
Admirer of the filmography of Sheridan for a long time, the actor quickly gave his consent. «I love his job, and it has been some years since they planned to work together», explains Craig. «When this plan came and that he contacted me, I said to him, ‘this marche’».
When he read the scenario of Loucka, Craig became identified with difficulties which Will crosses by trying to disentangle crisis. Just as the film director, the actor was sensitive to the fact that the reader loses his landmarks and has to call his sense of deduction. «If they believe in ghosts, then, yes, it is about a history of ghosts», he says. «If they don't believe in it, then this history is the fruit of imagination, what is also marvellous. They didn't want to favour an interpretation rather than other one. They wanted to leave the spectator free to be pronounced».
Daniel Craig understood that he is going to interpret two characters: «I represent a happy husband who lived in a home of dream with his wife and their two children, and suddenly, terrible events occur. They learn that a murder was made in this home: the woman and the children who lived were assassinated there, and these events begin affecting their life. It's as if it was them who were haunted by the home».
The actor found that the interpretation of a so unsettled character was more diffi cile that envisaged. «It was very hard», he follows. «The basics of the film in chronological order were turned and they besides began with the stages of the beginning. The instants of tension were turned by the end. It was very gruelling on plan emotional, but very satisfactory however the actor I am».
Naomi Watts represents Ann Patterson, neighbour of Will and Libby. Its acquaintance is made when Will gets ready to cross the street to speak to him about his daughter: they understand that she méfi e of her new neighbour and that she puts fast fi n in their dialogue. The film director recalls his choice: «Naomi plays his look wonderfully», he says. «She is of an extra ordinary precision, and they guess continuously of what she thinks only of seeing the eyes. As soon as it is seen in the film, they suspect that there is something strange at home». Of The Circle in The Promises Of Shadow and Funny Games U.s., the actress could always announce the feeling of faintness of her characters to the spectator of a simple look or of a seemingly insignificant gesture. What enticed her in Dream House, it was to include how «these three characters in strong temperament saw their destinies being mixed». De Le Cercle aux Les Promesses De L'Ombre et Funny Games U.s., la comédienne a toujours su communiquer le malaise de ses personnages au spectateur d’un simple regard ou d’un geste en apparence anodin. Ce qui l’a séduite dans Dream House, c’était de comprendre comment «ces trois personnages au fort tempérament voyaient leurs destins s’entremêler».
The actress recalls her character: «Ann has a former spouse with whom she really doesn't agree, and with whom she had a child, what provokes a lot of problems. Little by little, they try hard to understand what takes place in its private life, and if she needs that Will helps her, or if it is it who needs her. It is all these fundamental questions which asks the film».
Certainly, Naomi Watts Rachel Weisz was delighted at the idea of working with Jim Sheridan, and finding his friends Daniel Craig and, but it isn't the only reason which encouraged her to give its consent: «Ann made me think of a character hitchcockien», she entrusts. «There is something strange at home that attracted me. The spectator is going to wonder if it is necessary to love him or not... I love very much this type of questioning which provokes such character, and to interpret this type of mystery for an actor a pleasure» is always.
Rachel Weisz, oscarisée actress, was impressed by the clever mixture of emotion, of fantastic and of horror of scenario: she represents Libby, the wife unsettled by Will. It is necessary to say that perspective to give retort to other actors enticed it. «Daniel and Naomi had been already hired when I said yes in my turn, and conditions wouldn't therefore have been able to be more favourable», she signals. She adds:« The character of Daniel suffered a lot and is nervously exhausted. As for Ann, they smell that she knows a secret on Will's identity and that she knows who made murders – of what is unaware the public. For such role, one needed an actress who could play sensitivity and emotional complexity. They smell that a secret haunts her and that she is unsettled, but she doesn't manage say about what it is. Naomi expresses these feelings with a lot of delicacy. She has a big emotional depth, and it is the type of actress the face of which is expressive enough to go without dialogue».
The film director underlines: «Rachel, who represents Libby, is a splendid young woman and it is a passionate. Its role took more and more importance as plan advanced, because I realised that I wanted that she plays in more stages than what was envisaged in scenario. I therefore gave her more stages and she extemporised».
Daniel Craig also thinks that improvisation had its importance during filming: «Scenario gives an indication of what they are supposed to make», he says, «and it is a question of playing the stages which appear in script, but what is interesting later, it is to explore other tracks. It is necessary – as many as possible – to bring to light most emotions and the truth of every stage».
Two younger actresses of the film are those who keep the heaviest secrets of history: Taylor and Claire Geare, sisters in life, camp respectively Trish and Dee Dee, girls of Will and Libby. They have recently become famous in Inception de Chris Nolan. «Just as in In America, Sheridan found the children actors who suited perfectly», points out Daniel Craig. «He always tries to discover the most natural children who are and he is really fond that they are spontaneous, and especially not in actor's performance. They were incredible».
While the public learns for which destiny waits Trish and Dee Dee, both little girls express the fright which takes over the spectator. The film director, who has already worked with Taylor Geare for Brothers and who met his Clear sister on filming, explains: «You shouldn't play with the children: it is necessary to say them that it is in fact or not. Either it is 100 %, or it is nothing of the whole. There isn't golden mean».
Among supporting roles, Marton Csokas (Jack, the former spouse of Ann), Elias Koteas (Byce, the mysterious foreigner), Jane Alexander (the doctor Greeley), Rachel Fox (Chloe, girl of Ann and Jack), Joe Pingue (the ancient resident of the centre of readjustment of Peter Ward), Rachel Crawford (Ellen Bewes), Brian Murray (the doctor Medlin), and Sarah Gadon and Gregory Smith (Cindi and Artie, two neighbouring young people terrorised by the history of Peter Ward) is found.
James G. Robinson notices that supporting roles serve outlet to the spectator: «We make acquaintance of the characters of the world of Will and Libby», he says. «While they tell their story, the rooms of jigsaw puzzle gather, and we begin understanding which is this family, and what really arrived at him. The actors were improved, and could really provoke anxiety at the spectator».
Decors and filming:
By thinking about the production, Jim Sheridan knew that he wanted to differentiate distinctly between two worlds: «First is that of the home of dream, and second is that of a dilapidated home from which decoration falls in ruins», he underlines. «In the cinema, it is sometimes difficult to stage this type of contrast. Most often, the public doesn't pay attention if they content themselves with changing an element of decor».
To remedy it, the film-maker thinks that «the changes of frame must be translated by movement as, for example, when an actor crosses floor or that other one passes the hand across a wall, or which they see an object which hangs. Decors were conceived so that they understand in an obvious way, only to see walls, which the home throws in ruins. For example, there is a plan where Will comes back and discovers that the home was barricaded». It is the manager of the photograph Caleb Deschanel who lighted the film, while Carol Spier conceived decors. C’est le directeur de la photographie Caleb Deschanel qui a éclairé le film, tandis que Carol Spier en a conçu les décors.
Leader-interior decorator – who finds Naomi Watts, having shared the poster of The Promises Of Shadow with her – scooped out from the same sources of inspiration as for Silent Hill and Blade 2. She explains on the evolution of the style of the home: «I tried to make her as realistic as possible, even if a part across Will's imagination is received. At first, I made sure that the home has comfortable and homely air, as though it was an ancient residence which Will and Libby wanted to restore. The dilapidated aspect of the home is a bit exaggerated, while remaining realistic».
Deschanel shares the same conception as leader-interior decorator: «They worked on contrasts in a delicate way, with changes of brightness or of ambience. They used not enough visual effects, which require to turn on green funds, and to change backgrounds in postproduction. It allows to create a feeling of real in that the spectator has his landmarks, without feeling being deceived. It's as if they attended a hat trick and that the magician in work without ever was noticed leaving him of eyes».
Leader-costumer Delphine White adds: «It was necessary me to create two worlds, without its being absolutely obvious that the first should be real and the second imagination. I tried to give to the main actors an ethereal air, by choosing them a bit diaphanous clothes. Libby's keepings become darker towards the end of the film, when Will wonders if she died or if she is the product of her imagination».
The leader make-up artist Donald Mowat recalls the evolution of the character of Will: «Suggestions – of wigs, hair on the face, some dust or some blood were made – and they asked Daniel what put him at ease most. Not it is better to load the small boat in making-up and hairstyle, because it is small a priori insignificant details which it is preferable to work. For example, pockets under eyes or chapped lips are signs which point out that a character is in full distress and suffered».
If the film director wanted to limit appeal to special effects, he however didn't hesitate to use them if necessary. The superviseuse special effects definite Sophie Vertigan: «At the beginning of the fi lm, a snowstorm occurs, while they are in April, and the snow is omnipresent. As the film advances, and as they discover what took place, the snow starts to melt progressively».
